Mumia Abu-Jamal's defense attorney provides an account of his client's struggle for justice as he describes the 1982 conviction of the award-winning journalist for the killing of a police officer. - (Baker & Taylor)
Mumia Abu-Jamal's defense attorney provides readers with a definitive and compelling account of his client's struggle for justice, as it describes the 1982 conviction of award-winning Philadelphia journalist Mumia Abu-Jamal for the killing of a police officer and the controversy that has rocked this death-row case. 20,000 first printing. - (Baker & Taylor)
Mumia Abu-Jamal is an award-winning journalist and author of three well-received books and many essays. He is also a death-row inmate, awaiting execution in Pennsylvania for allegedly killing a police officer in 1981. For many around the world, he is an inspired leader and the centerpiece to a revived progressive movement critical of our justice system and escalating global economic inequities. For others, he is a cold-blooded killer who has duped millions, including a vast array of Hollywood celebrities, writers, intellectuals and world political leaders, into believing that he is a political prisoner falsely imprisoned. Whatever the outlook, he and his case have become a flashpoint in the ever-raging debate over capital punishment in this country and a symbol of what is wrong with our criminal justice system.
Here, for the first time, the story of Mumia Abu-Jamal's trial and his struggle to gain his freedom has been told. Executing Justice takes us inside the courtroom where a fierce and skilled prosecutor wove a damning narrative of a young black radical who brutally murdered a young white police officer in the red-light district of Philadelphia, and then later boasted about the killing. It was, the prosecutor said, the strongest murder case he's ever tried. Daniel R. Williams, defense lawyer and chief legal strategist for Mumia Abu-Jamal, invites us to ask: why has this case engendered such enormous attention and aroused the passions of people worldwide?
Executing Justice is the story of how the death penalty really works in this country—not from the perspective of appellate judges, academics, or politicians who pontificate about the pros and cons of capital punishment, but from ground zero, within the pit of the courtroom where the war over life and death is fought. It is also a story of one of the most remarkable trials in our history. Above all, Executing Justice is an honest, at times confessional, book that seeks not to preach, but to raise questions about what we expect from our legal system and the depth of our commitment to capital punishment as a form of executing justice.
- (
McMillan Palgrave)
Daniel R. Williams currently specializes in death penalty litigation. Since graduating from Harvard Law School in 1986, he has been involved in many high-profile criminal cases, both as a trial and appellate lawyer, as well as an activist in international human rights work. He often speaks publicly on issues concerning capital punishment, criminal justice, and civil rights, and his published writings range from essays concerning philosophy and legal theory to articles targeted at practicing lawyers. Awards for his work include the Thurgood Marshall Award and the Morton Stavis Memorial Justice Award. He lives in Manhattan with his wife and daughter.
- (
McMillan Palgrave)
Booklist Reviews
The case of black journalist Abu-Jamal, convicted in 1982 of murdering a Philadelphia policeman, has stirred ardent advocates, pro and con. Against him are law and order advocates pushing for the execution of a cop killer. His advocates, who include noted writers and actors, raise concerns about racial justice. In this book, Abu-Jamal's defense attorney weighs in on the legal and social ambiguities of his case. Williams got involved in the case in 1992. He details Abu-Jamal's Black Panther background and the political atmosphere of Philadelphia, whose police resolved conflict with MOVE, a radical black nationalist group, by firebombing its headquarters, but he focuses on the legal issues surrounding whether Abu-Jamal received a fair trial. Williams steers clear of issues of guilt and innocence as he looks at the fault lines at the intersection of racial politics and criminal justice. More legally analytical than Terry Bisson's On a Move [BKL F 15 01], this is still an accessible book, one that shows, too, Abu-Jamal's passionate commitment to speaking for the voiceless and powerless. ((Reviewed May 15, 2001)) Copyright 2001 Booklist Reviews